Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 14 (16.47%) An intervention strategy is identified And, The strategy identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) An intervention strategy is identified But, The strategy identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) No intervention strategy is identified Feedback:

Methods/design: The Values and Options in Cancer Care (VOICE) Study is a National Cancer Institute sponsored randomized controlled trial conducted in the Rochester/Buffalo, NY and Sacramento, CA regions. A total of 40 oncologists, approximately 400 patients with advanced cancer, and their family/friend caregivers (one per patient, when available) are expected to enroll in the study.
January 25, 2019
Identify the health behavior theory used in this article.5. Provide your assessment of why this theory would or would not be a good fit for the program you are proposing for your Health Promotion Program Proposal.
January 25, 2019

Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 14 (16.47%) An intervention strategy is identified And, The strategy identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) An intervention strategy is identified But, The strategy identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) No intervention strategy is identified Feedback:

Provided an assessment of whether the intervention strategy was appropriate–
Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the appropriatenes s of the intervention strategy And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 14 (16.47%) Provided an assessment of the appropriateness of the intervention strategy But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the intervention strategy And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:
Summarized how the theory was used to develop the intervention–
Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 16 (18.82%) – 16 (18.82%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided a summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Some detail was missing Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) Provided a partial summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention But, Significant detail was missing Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Did not summarize how the theory was used to develop the intervention Feedback:
Provided an assessment of why the theory would or would not be a good fit for the proposed program–
Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 16 (18.82%) – 16 (18.82%) Provided an assessment of the whether or not the theory would be appropriate And, Provided sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided an assessment of the theory But, Did not provide sufficient detail to support the assessment Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory But, Did indicate whether or not the strategy was appropriate Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Did not provide an assessment of the theory And, Did not indicate whether the strategy was appropriate Feedback:
Correct APA citation provided–
Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 0 (0%) – 3 (3.53%) Partially Met/Good 0 (0%) – 3 (3.53%) Partially Met/Fair 0 (0%) – 3 (3.53%) Not Met 0 (0%) – 3 (3.53%) Feedback:
Correctly identified the primary health behavior theory used to develop the intervention–
Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 0 (0%) – 4 (4.71%) Partially Met/Good 0 (0%) – 4 (4.71%) Partially Met/Fair 0 (0%) – 4 (4.71%) Not Met 0 (0%) – 4 (4.71%) Feedback:
Total Points: 85


 

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH STUDENT HOMEWORKS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

get-your-custom-paper


.

.

The post Levels of Achievement: Fully Met 15 (17.65%) – 15 (17.65%) Provided a thorough summary of the way the theory was used to develop the intervention Partially Met/Good 10 (11.76%) – 14 (16.47%) An intervention strategy is identified And, The strategy identified was appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article But, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Partially Met/Fair 1 (1.18%) – 9 (10.59%) An intervention strategy is identified But, The strategy identified is not appropriate for the type of intervention described in the article And, The strategy identified is not the strategy used in the article Not Met 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) No intervention strategy is identified Feedback: appeared first on STUDENT HOMEWORKS.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp
%d bloggers like this: