Module 4 | Patient’s Five Wishes
Instructions
Review the Five Wishes SampleDownload Five Wishes Sample document. Then, choose a family member or friend as a patient and complete the Patient’s Five WishesDownload Patient’s Five Wishesdocument.
Initial Post
Provide a summary of the individual, including any healthcare concerns, and upload your Patient’s Five Wishes document for peer review. Include your thoughts regarding any wishes that you feel would be difficult to uphold as the family member/friend.
DO NOT include any personal identifiers in the document.
Citation: Aging With Dignity. (2011). Five wishes.
Response Prompts
Respond to at least two of your peers’ posts in a substantive manner. Assume the nurse’s role, and this Patient’s Five Wishes document has been presented to you for your patient. Use the response prompts to guide your content.
- Identify at least one “wish†that may need to be discussed with the patient and family or expanded upon. How would you educate the patient and family?
- What is your role in advocating for this patient’s wishes?
- Assume the medical provider or family did not want to follow the wishes. How would you handle this situation? Explain.
Due
- Initial post due Wednesday, by 11:59 p.m.
- Responses to two classmates’ posts are due Saturday, by 11:59 p.m.
This schedule ensures that you have adequate time to prepare initial responses, read through the posts, and supply meaningful reactions that extend the conversation.
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation
15 ptsOutstandingPatient’s Five Wishes document is completed in its entirety and uses appropriate language.
12 ptsGoodPatient’s Five Wishes document is completed in its entirety and uses mostly appropriate language.
8 ptsProficientPatient’s Five Wishes document is missing a couple of sections and uses somewhat appropriate language.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementPatient’s Five Wishes document is missing multiple sections and uses inappropriate language and contains grammatical errors.
0 ptsUnacceptablePatient’s Five Wishes document not submitted with initial post.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstration of Knowledge and Understanding of Content
45 ptsOutstandingThe content in the post(s) and responses reveal pertinent and thoughtful information. They expertly show evidence of knowledge and understanding of course content.
35 ptsGoodThe content in the post(s) and responses mostly reveal pertinent information and includes thoughtful information. They show evidence of knowledge and understanding of most areas of course content but may be missing some information or detail.
25 ptsProficientThe content in the post(s) and responses reveal some pertinent information and thoughtful information. They show basic evidence of knowledge and understanding of some areas of course content but major points may be missing in the content or not included wholly.
15 ptsNeeds ImprovementThe content in the post(s) and responses reveal little pertinent information and thoughtful information. They show little evidence of knowledge and understanding of course content and major points are not included in the content.
0 ptsUnacceptableThe content is significantly incomplete or lacks any critical thinking and depth.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Substance of Responses
45 ptsOutstandingStrong evidence of critical thinking is demonstrated. Thoughtful and complete responses are added that directly address all aspects of the topic. Responses offer an extension of the original posting or alternative point of view to foster further discussion.
35 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking is demonstrated with thoughtful responses. Some considerations or connections might be missing specific details or information but responses offer an extension of the original posting or alternative point of view to foster further discussion.
25 ptsProficientCritical thinking is loosely identified or not properly connected. Details and relation between thoughts are lacking. Responses offer some extension of the original posting or alternative pt of view to foster further discussion.
15 ptsNeeds ImprovementCritical thinking is difficult to identify or is severely lacking. Basic thoughts and consideration are demonstrated but do not show means of connections. Responses offer little insight to further discussion or include responses like “I agree” or “Good point.”
0 ptsUnacceptableNo critical thinking is identified. Significant detail and considerations to connect points and come to conclusions is not seen. Responses do not offer new insight to further discussion or include responses like “I agree” or “Good point.”
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language
15 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.
12 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style, with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.
8 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style, with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuse of style, with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.
0 ptsUnacceptableSignificant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined, with no professional tone.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
15 ptsOutstandingFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required is used), with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary), with no errors.
12 ptsGoodFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required), with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary), with minimal (<2) errors.
8 ptsProficientFormatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required), with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided, with some (3-5) errors.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementFormatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided, with significant (>5) errors.
0 ptsUnacceptableFormatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition
15 ptsOutstandingExpert level of writing with little to no errors.
12 ptsGoodGood level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.
8 ptsProficientAverage level of writing with some (3-5) errors.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.
0 ptsUnacceptableLevel of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.
15 pts
Total Points: 150
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
