Module 7 | Nursing Process Project: Evaluation
Overview
You are now ready to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and whether your goals for the client have been met. Remember, the nursing process is cyclical and ongoing. The evaluation phase includes assessment and reassessment.
For example, if you set a goal to lose 10 lbs in one month, maybe it wasn’t realistic to set this goal during the holiday season. Maybe your interventions should have included eliminating sugary drinks in addition to French Fries.
This is like weighing yourself after one week of being on a new diet. Perhaps your goal was to lose one pound in 7 days. Your interventions included reducing the number of French fries you consume in a week and eating one apple a day for 7 days. After 7 days, your intervention was to reassess your weight. You step on the scale, and you gained two pounds!
As a reminder, an overview of the Nursing Process Project and the project resources can be found in Module 3: Nursing Process Project: Overview.
Instructions
The final part of the Nursing Process Project requires you to complete the Evaluation section on the Nursing Process Project template. Follow these steps to complete this part of the project.
Step 1: Complete the Evaluation section of the Nursing Process Project template Download Nursing Process Project template. If a category is non-applicable, simply write NA in that section of the template.
Step 2: Implement instructor comments and edits to previous sections of the Nursing Process Project template.
- Assessment
- Diagnosis
- Planning
- Implementation
Step 3: Submit the entire Nursing Process Project template for final instructor review.
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
- Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. For help on how to submit your assignment, see How Do I Upload a File as an Assignment Submission in Canvas?Links to an external site.
- Review the Nursing Process Project Rubric for grading criteria.
- This activity is worth 100 points toward your final grade.
Rubric
NUR 211 – Nursing Process Project Rubric (2)
NUR 211 – Nursing Process Project Rubric (2)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment
14 ptsOutstandingAssessment is thorough and includes all relevant topics. Questions provided are utilized.
11.2 ptsGoodAssessment is thorough and includes most relevant topics. Questions are used to a degree.
8.4 ptsProficientAssessment is provided but has missing relevant topics. Questions provided are minimally used.
5.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementAssessment is lacking significant information. Questions provided are not utilized.
0 ptsUnacceptableAssessment is absent or severely lacking appropriate information.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiagnosis
14 ptsOutstandingDiagnoses provided are relevant, time appropriate, and pertinent to the purpose of the assignment.
11.2 ptsGoodDiagnoses provided are relevant, time appropriate, and may or may not be priority to the assignment.
8.4 ptsProficientDiagnoses provided are mostly relevant with some irrelevant pieces and are not priority diagnoses.
5.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementDiagnoses provided are irrelevant and not priority.
0 ptsUnacceptableDiagnoses are absent or lacking.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlanning
14 ptsOutstandingTwo short-term goals are listed, clear and concise, and measurable.
11.2 ptsGoodTwo short-term goals are listed, may be clear and concise, or mostly measurable.
8.4 ptsProficientTwo short-term goals are listed but are not clear or concise. 1 is not measurable.
5.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementOne short-term goal is listed or both are not clear or concise and not measurable.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo goals are listed or are irrelevant.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplementation
20 ptsOutstandingNursing interventions are appropriate and applicable.
15 ptsGoodNursing interventions are mostly appropriate and applicable.
10 ptsProficientNursing interventions are either appropriate or not practical to implementation.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementNursing interventions are not appropriate and not practical to be implemented.
0 ptsUnacceptableNursing interventions are absent or are impractical.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation
20 ptsOutstandingEvaluation was complete and thorough and showed thought for a cyclical process.
15 ptsGoodEvaluation was complete with some details or considerations lacking.
10 ptsProficientEvaluation was missing reflection. Many considerations or issues with goals are missing.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementEvaluation was non-reflective and did not show consideration for a cyclical process.
0 ptsUnacceptableEvaluation aspect was absent or missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language
4 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Superior use of style and variety provided in a professional tone.
3.2 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor (<2) errors with use of style with some variety provided. Professional tone maintained throughout.
2.4 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors or misuse of style with minimal variety. Professional tone maintained throughout.
1.6 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average use and control of language. Significant (>5) errors or misuses of style with no variety. Professional tone not maintained throughout assignment.
0 ptsUnacceptableSignificant issues with use and control of language. Style and variety unable to be determined with no professional tone.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
5 ptsOutstandingFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) used with no errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with no errors.
4 ptsGoodFormatting follows assignment directions (APA as required) with minimal (<2) errors. Citations provided (if necessary) with minimal (<2) errors.
3 ptsProficientFormatting mostly follows assignment directions (APA as required) with some (3-5) errors. Citations (if necessary) provided with some (3-5) errors.
2 ptsNeeds ImprovementFormatting (APA as required) errors (>5) make following the assignment difficult. Citations (if necessary) mostly provided with significant (>5) errors.
0 ptsUnacceptableFormatting does not follow assignment directions. Significant errors make formatting illegible. Citations (if necessary) do not follow APA format.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly/Professional Composition
5 ptsOutstandingExpert level of writing with little to no errors.
4 ptsGoodGood level of writing with minimal (<2) errors.
3 ptsProficientAverage level of writing with some (3-5) errors.
2 ptsNeeds ImprovementBelow average level of writing with significant (>5) errors.
0 ptsUnacceptableLevel of writing is far below what is expected for scholarly/professional composition.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Outcome 3
Develop patient problem and concern statements using standard language.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 ptsExceeds Mastery
3 ptsMastery
2 ptsNear Mastery
1 ptsBelow Mastery
0 ptsNo Evidence
4 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
