Week 8 Assignment
Week 8 Assignment
Week 8 Assignment
Table of Contents
ToggleThe purpose of this assignment is to allow time of reflection to evaluate self-performance and the meeting of course outcomes that serve student growth as a future practitioner.
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
This assignment is worth 30 points.
In a Word document, answer the following questions and submit to the assignment dropbox.
Answer all six questions to receive full credit.
Provide the question along with your response.
Citations and references are not required for this assignment.
Table of Contents
ToggleAddictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To prepare:
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.
Submit your Assignment.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?What were the author’s claims?
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a description of the author’s claims.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims.
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomeo Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article…. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article…. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
25 to >22.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
22 to >19.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
19 to >17.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
17 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
The presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, and/or the reference list is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.5 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Develop an organizational scheme for the vital information about the disorder.
Create a study guide for intellectual disorders. Your study guide should be in the form of an outline with references. You should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative!
Areas of importance you should address, but are not limited to, are:
Signs and symptoms according to the DSM-5-TR
Differential diagnoses
Incidence
Development and course
Prognosis
Considerations related to culture, gender, and age.
Pharmacological treatments, including any side effects.
Nonpharmacological treatments
Diagnostics and labs
Comorbidities
Legal and ethical considerations
Pertinent patient education considerations
Hilt, R. J., & Nussbaum, A. M. (2016). DSM-5 pocket guide for child and adolescent mental health American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Chapter 12, “Developmental Milestonesâ€
Thapar, A., Pine, D. S., Leckman, J. F., Scott, S., Snowling, M. J., & Taylor, E. A. (2015). Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
Chapter 51, “Autism Spectrum Disorderâ€
Chapter 55, “ADHD and Hyperkinetic Disorderâ€
Utah State University. (n.d.). Creating study guides https://www.usu.edu/academic-support/test/creating_study_guides
Walden University. (2020). https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-
center/skills/tutorials/success-strategies
Zakhari, R. (2020). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual. Springer.
Chapter 13, “Child/Adolescent Neurodevelopmental Disordersâ€
Dillon, K. (2019, March 23). DSM-5 neurodevelopmental disorders. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx4GuyX5Sgc
The National Center for Learning Disabilities. (2013, February 20). [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/0Wz7LdLFJVM
Osmosis. (2017, October 17). [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/x2hWVgZ8J4A
RUBRIC
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCreate a study guide, in outline form with references, for your assigned disorder. Incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards.
30 to >26.0 pts
Excellent
The response is in a well-organized and detailed outline form. Informative and well-designed visual elements are incorporated….Followed directions correctly by uploading assignment to Gradebook and submitted to the discussion forum area.
26 to >23.0 pts
Good
The response is in an organized and detailed outline form. Appropriate visual elements are incorporated….Partially followed directions by uploading assignment to Gradebook but did not submit to the discussion forum area.
23 to >20.0 pts
Fair
The response is in outline form, with some inaccuracies or details missing. Visual elements are somewhat vague or inaccurate….Partially followed directions by submitting to the discussion forum area but did not upload assignment to Gradebook.
20 to >0 pts
Poor
The response is unorganized, not in outline form, or is missing. Visual elements are inaccurate or missing….Did not follow directions as did not submit to discussion forum area and did not upload assignment to gradebook per late policy.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent areas of importance you should address, but are not limited to, are:• Signs and symptoms according to the DSM-5-TR• Differential diagnoses• Incidence• Development and course• Prognosis• Considerations related to culture, gender, age• Pharmacological treatments, including any side effects• Nonpharmacological treatments• Diagnostics and labs• Comorbidities• Legal and ethical considerations• Pertinent patient education considerations
50 to >44.0 pts
Excellent
The response throughly addresses all required content areas.
44 to >39.0 pts
Good
The response adequately addresses all required content areas. Minor details may be missing.
39 to >34.0 pts
Fair
The response addresses all required content areas, with some inaccuracies or vagueness. No more than one or two content areas are missing.
34 to >0 pts
Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately addresses the required content areas. Or, three or more content areas are missing.
50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport your guide with references to the DSM-5-TR and at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent
The response is supported by the DSM-5 and at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair
Three evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.
6 to >0 pts
Poor
Two or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The guide follows correct APA format for parenthetical/narrative in-text citations and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 to >3.5 pts
Good
Contains one or two APA format errors
3.5 to >3.0 pts
Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors
3 to >0 pts
Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Week 8 Assignment
Week 8 Assignment
Lab topic : Configuring BitLocker and Windows Encryption
Assignment: Legal and Ethical Issues Related to Psychiatric Emergencies
Photo Credit: Getty Images
The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team and law enforcement officials (when indicated), and effectively communicate with family members who are often overwhelmed in emergency situations. In their role, PMHNPs can ensure a smooth transition from emergency mental health care to follow-up care, and also bridge the physical–mental health divide in healthcare.
In this week’s Assignment, you explore legal and ethical issues surrounding psychiatric emergencies, and identify evidence-based suicide and violence risk assessments.
To Prepare
The Assignment
In 2–3 pages, address the following:
By Day 7 of Week 8
Submit your Assignment. Attach copies of or links to the suicide and violence risk assessments you selected.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Week 8 Assignment
Week 8 Assignment
Week 8 Assignment
Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
An important consideration when working with patients is their cultural background. Understanding an individual’s culture and personal experiences provides insight into who the person is and where he or she may progress in the future. Culture helps to establish a sense of identity, as well as to set values, behaviors, and purpose for individuals within a society. Culture may also contribute to a divide between specific interpretations of cultural behavior and societal norms. What one culture may deem as appropriate another culture may find inappropriate. As a result, it is important for advanced practice nurses to remain aware of cultural considerations and interpretations of behavior for diagnosis, especially with reference to substance-related disorders. At the same time, PMHNPs must balance their professional and legal responsibilities for assessment and diagnosis with such cultural considerations and interpretations.
For this Assignment, you will practice assessing and diagnosing a patient in a case study who is experiencing a substance-related or addictive disorder. With this and all cases, remember to consider the patient’s cultural background.
Table of Contents
ToggleBy Day 7 of Week 8
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Open this item from the Assignments menu to view the rubric and download the attached detailed assignment description.
The required template for the Incident Report is provided on the last page of the assignment description file.
After submitting your file to Turn It In for originality checking, attach it here and submit for grading.
Have a questions? Do not hesitate to ask. Our operators are more than ready to help 24/7. Reach us on WhatsApp, Email, or Call us
101 S. Main Street
Los Angeles, CA 90112
+1(209)962-2652
support@studenthomeworks.com