Module 1 | Levels of Evidence

/in /by

Levels of Evidence

Instructions

Watch the video Levels of Evidence – Why You Shouldn’t Always Trust the Experts!Links to an external site. (2:18).

 

 

Read the following article:

Complete the Learning Activity for Identifying Levels of Evidence based upon the knowledge gained from the video and article assigned in this activity. Then, return to this page and answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document.

  1. What are the most important characteristics of an information source for you to consider before using the source to help you with your practice?
  2. How important do you think your information-management skills will be to your success as a professional nurse? Why or why not?
  3. What are key challenges you have faced in finding authentic sources of information?

Note: This activity is for practice only.

Citations:

Gray Matters. (2021, October 25). Levels of evidence – Why you shouldn’t always trust the experts! [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/yyDxJf39iCA

Peterson, M. H., Barnason, S., Donnelly, B., Hill, K., Miley, H., Riggs, L., & Whiteman, K. (2014). Choosing the best evidence to guide clinical practice: Application of AACN levels of evidence. Critical Care Nurse 34(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2014411

 

Submission and Assessment Guidelines

  • Submit the completed Learning Activity for Identifying Levels of Evidence worksheet and your Microsoft Word document with the answers to the questions clearly listed and answered.
  • Each response should be clear, concise, and use correct grammar. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
  • Review the Learning Activity Rubric for grading criteria.
  • This activity is worth 100 points.

Rubric

NUR 337 – Learning Activity Rubric

NUR 337 – Learning Activity Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

70 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking and provides rationale as well as examples and specific details.

63 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details are mostly specific.

56 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details but usually of a generalized nature.

49 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.

0 ptsNo MarksIdea presence is limited and not supported.

70 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

30 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.

27 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.

24 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.

21 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.

0 ptsNo MarksContent is not sound.

30 pts

Total Points: 100

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers