Patient Experience

Overview

This discussion integrates your experiences with client safety concerns during patient care.

Instructions

Based upon an experience in which you encountered a client safety issue in an acute care setting or outpatient setting, write 200–250 words responding to the discussion prompts provided. This could be a situation in which you were the patient, a family member, or an employee. Then, respond to at least two of your peers’ posts substantively. Each response needs to have a minimum of 100 words.

Discussion Prompts

• Describe the problem (patient safety/quality issue) you have experienced in an acute care or outpatient setting.
• Identify at least three factors that contributed to the problem.
• Based on the concepts that you’ve learned related to improving patient safety and quality, what recommendations would you make to improve this issue? Provide at least two recommendations.

Module 2 Discussion Board Rubric

Module 2 Discussion Board Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstration of Knowledge and Understanding of Content in Initial Post

25 ptsOutstandingAnswers all discussion questions and prompts with pertinent information demonstrating critical thinking and thorough understanding of course content. Post exceeds 200 words in length.

20 ptsGoodAnswers all discussion questions. Missing detailed information on 1 prompt or required elements. Post exceeds 200 words in length.

15 ptsProficientAnswers all discussion questions. Some answers are superficial without clear evidence of critical thinking and understanding of content. Lacks detailed information and missing 2 prompts or required elements. Initial post below 200 words but exceeds 150 words.

10 ptsNeeds ImprovementBriefly answers all questions but some responses are not correct and/or do not demonstrate understanding of course content. Missing 3+ prompts or majority of required elements. Post does not exceed 150 words.

0 ptsUnacceptableNo discussion board post/no submission.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Substance of Peer Responses

15 ptsOutstandingProvides 2 response posts to peers that demonstrate critical thinking and directly address the original post. The post demonstrates extension of the original post, an alternative point of view to foster further discussion or reference/resources to support their response.

12 ptsGoodProvides 2 response posts to peers that directly address the original post. One post is not substantive (not extending knowledge of the original post, an alternative point of view or resources to support response)

9 ptsProficient1 or 2 response posts are submitted but they could be more substantive or offer little insight to further discussion or a repeat of information already posted without adding further information showing critical thinking. May include responses like “I agree” or “good point” with some supporting evidence but not thoroughly written.

6 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse posts “I agree” or “good point,” or a repeat of information already posted without adding further information showing critical thinking. Student responds to a maximum of 1 peer.

0 ptsUnacceptableNo response posts. Student does not respond to any peers.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language/Grammar/Composition

10 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Posts and Responses are clearly written and understandable. No misspelled words or typographical errors Citation provided if reference/author cited in posts. APA formatting of reference is used expertly with no errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) minimum of 1 peer-reviewed reference and minimum of 1 reference published within the last 5 years.

8 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor errors (< 2) such as misspelled words, typographical errors or sentence structure issues. APA formatting of references is used with 1-2 errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) maximum of 1 peer-reviewed reference and maximum of 1 reference published within the last 5 years.

6 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors in post. APA formatting of references is used with 3-4 errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) maximum of 1 peer-reviewed reference. References are published >5 years ago.

4 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds improvement. Below average use and control of language. Significant errors (>5) such as misspelled words, typographical errors or sentence structure issues. APA formatting of references is used with 5+ errors. Does not include (as required for specific courses) 1 peer-reviewed reference. References are published >5 years ago.

0 ptsUnacceptableSentences are incoherent and/or improperly structured. Post has multiple typographical errors, misspelled words, which do not reflect appropriate level of writing. APA formatting of references are not used and/or references not included.

10 pts

Total Points: 50

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.