NUR-611 – PowerPoint Presentation – SR
PowerPoint Presentation: Advanced Practice in Nursing
Learning Objectives
- Formulate a researchable problem and question in advanced nursing practice.
- Distinguish between qualitative and quantitative research designs.
- Apply middle-range nursing theory to a practice issue.
- Critique a peer-reviewed studies and assess their applicability to practice.
- Deliver a clear, professional video presentation with scholarly content.
Assignment Instructions
You are required to submit both of the following:
A PowerPoint presentation (10–15 slides), including:
- Title slide and References (not counted in the 10–15)
- Speaker notes in the Notes section of each slide
- APA format for citations and references
- At least 4 scholarly sources (within the last 5 years)
A video recording of you presenting the slides:
- Must include a cameo video (your face must appear on screen)
- Audio-only or narrated-only videos will not be accepted
- Tools you may use: PowerPoint Record, Zoom, Loom, Panopto, etc.
Content Requirements
Follow this structure in your presentation:
1. Research Problem (Slide 1–2)
- Identify a current issue in advanced nursing practice.
- Explain why it is a problem (in 3 sentences or fewer).
- State your research question clearly.
2. Research Design (Slide 3)
- Indicate whether a qualitative or quantitative study best answers your question.
- Justify your choice.
3. Middle-Range Theory (Slide 4)
- Select and briefly describe a middle-range nursing theory.
- Explain its relevance to your chosen research problem.
4. Literature Review and Study Critique (Slides 5–12)
Utilizing your Literature review from earlier in the course, summarize and critique the relevant studies based on its design.
If Qualitative:
- Study purpose and design
- Ethical considerations
- Sampling and recruitment
- Data collection and analysis methods
- Rigor (4 criteria: credibility, dependability, transferability, confirmability)
- Key findings and limitations
- Trustworthiness and nursing implications
If Quantitative:
- Study purpose and design
- Blinding and randomization
- Ethical considerations
- Sampling method and sample size
- Data collection instruments and procedures
- Validity and reliability
- Statistical analysis and significance
- Key findings and limitations
- Trustworthiness and nursing implications
5. Conclusion (Slide 13–14)
- Recap key takeaways
- Reflect on the importance of using research and theory in advanced nursing practice
6. References Slide (Final Slide)
- APA format
- At least 4 scholarly references from the last 5 years
Suggested Slide-by-Slide Template
SlideContent
1
Title Slide (Name, Course, Date, Presentation Title)
2
Research Problem (brief background)
3
Research Question
4
Research Design (Qualitative or Quantitative + justification)
5
Middle-Range Theory & Relevance
6
Study Overview – Purpose and Design
7
Study – Sampling, Recruitment, Ethics
8
Study – Data Collection & Analysis
9
Study – Rigor (qual) or Validity/Reliability (quant)
10
Study – Key Findings and Limitations
11
Study – Applicability/Trustworthiness
12
Nursing Practice Implications
13
Conclusion / Summary
14
References (APA)
Add or combine slides as needed, as long as the content is covered and the total number of slides does not exceed 15.
Submission Details
- Due: FRiday by 11:59 PM ET
- Submission: File Upload
- Part one: Slide deck and your speaker’s notes
- Part two: Video presentation of your topic.
- Late policy: See course syllabus
- Your submission will be reviewed for plagiarism with Turnitin.
Grading Rubric
Grading Rubric: PowerPoint Presentation – Advanced Practice in Nursing (100 Points)
PowerPoint Presentation – Advanced Practice in Nursing
PowerPoint Presentation – Advanced Practice in Nursing
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Content & Organization
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
25 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
18 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
10 pts
/25 pts
Research Design & Theoretical Application
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
20 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
14 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
8 pts
/20 pts
Study Critique (Qualitative or Quantitative)
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
25 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
18 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
10 pts
/25 pts
APA Format & Scholarly Sources
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
10 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
7 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
4 pts
/10 pts
Slide Design & Speaker Notes
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
10 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
7 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
4 pts
/10 pts
Video Presentation
view longer description
Excellent (Full Credit)
Fully meets the ‘Excellent’ description in the assignment rubric.
10 pts
Proficient (Partial Credit)
Meets most expectations with minor gaps; generally solid work.
7 pts
Needs Improvement
Does not sufficiently meet expectations; key elements missing or inaccurate.
4 pts
/10 pts
ATTACHED paper instructor review
Your paper demonstrates a distinguished understanding of the scholarly project topic, the rationale, background, significance, and expected outcomes. It effectively integrates evidence to justify the project, aligns with nursing practice priorities, and provides a clear, structured PICOT question.
Areas of Strength:
- Clear PICOT Statement: The PICOT question is well-formulated, specific, and directly aligned with the project focus on structured medication reconciliation in adults ≥65 in primary care. It clearly identifies the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe.
- Purpose/Rationale: The introduction effectively explains why this scholarly project is necessary. It links polypharmacy and adverse drug events in older adults to gaps in current medication reconciliation practices, emphasizing health promotion, patient safety, and potential cost containment. The rationale is evidence-based, citing relevant literature.
- Background and Evidence: You provide a robust background on the problem, including the prevalence of polypharmacy, physiological changes in older adults, and risks of fragmented care. Data from primary sources are integrated appropriately to support the need for the project.
- Significance to Nursing and Health Care: You explicitly describe how medication reconciliation aligns with nursing practice, highlighting NPs’ and nurses’ roles in patient education, care continuity, and interprofessional collaboration. The impact on broader healthcare quality and efficiency is addressed.
- Benefit to Practice: The expected outcomes are clearly articulated (reduced hospitalizations, improved medication accuracy, enhanced patient understanding), and you link the intervention to evidence-based practice principles and potential scalability to other populations and settings.
Areas for Improvement:
- Reference Currency: References must be no more than 5 years old. Review the APA guidelines for formatting.
- Clarity and Flow: While the content is thorough, a few paragraphs are long and contain multiple concepts. Breaking them into shorter, focused paragraphs could improve readability.
- Quantitative Context: You could strengthen the background by including specific statistics on hospitalization rates or medication errors in adults ≥65 to further highlight the magnitude of the problem.
- Explicit Link to Evidence-Based Guidelines: While evidence is cited, referencing specific national guidelines (e.g., AHRQ or Joint Commission recommendations for medication reconciliation) could further strengthen the scholarly grounding.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
