Instructions
Read Unfolding Case Study: Activity 2. Then, answer the reflective questions.
Case Study
Jean had been living alone at home for two months after her diagnosis. One day when waking up, she developed lightheadedness. She called her son to help her. Her son insisted on driving her to the emergency room, where the doctors decided she would be admitted for tests. A CT scan revealed cancer had metastasized (spread) to her brain. The doctor and nurse discussed the situation with her four sons. The four sons were unable to stay with their mother. Although Jean was a very independent woman who wanted to go home, she would not be allowed to return home, but instead, the social worker arranged for her to be admitted to a long-term care facility.
Reflective Questions
After reading the case study, answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document. Refer to the learning material presented in this module for guidance.
- What interventions protect patients from falling in the long-term care setting?
- How is the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL’s) related to safety?
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
- Submit your Microsoft Word document with the questions clearly listed and answered. All of the questions MUST be answered in your document.
- Each response should be 3–5 sentences in length, clear and concise, original (using your own words), and free of grammatical errors.
- Turnitin is enabled for this assignment.
- Review the Unfolding Case Study Rubric for grading criteria.
- This activity is worth 25 points.
Rubric
NUR 211 – Unfolding Case Study Rubric
NUR 211 – Unfolding Case Study Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections (80%)
20 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking, provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.
15 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.
10 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details, but usually of a generalized nature.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.
0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent (20%)
5 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.
4 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.
3 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.
2 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.
0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.
5 pts
Total Points: 25
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Module 3 | Unfolding Case Study: Activity 2
/in /byTable of Contents
Instructions
Read Unfolding Case Study: Activity 2. Then, answer the reflective questions.
Case Study
Jean had been living alone at home for two months after her diagnosis. One day when waking up, she developed lightheadedness. She called her son to help her. Her son insisted on driving her to the emergency room, where the doctors decided she would be admitted for tests. A CT scan revealed cancer had metastasized (spread) to her brain. The doctor and nurse discussed the situation with her four sons. The four sons were unable to stay with their mother. Although Jean was a very independent woman who wanted to go home, she would not be allowed to return home, but instead, the social worker arranged for her to be admitted to a long-term care facility.
Reflective Questions
After reading the case study, answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document. Refer to the learning material presented in this module for guidance.
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
Rubric
NUR 211 – Unfolding Case Study Rubric
NUR 211 – Unfolding Case Study Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections (80%)
20 ptsOutstandingEvidence of critical thinking, provides rationale, as well as examples and specific details.
15 ptsGoodEvidence of critical thinking and details, mostly specific.
10 ptsProficientEvidence of critical thinking and details, but usually of a generalized nature.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementIdea presence is limited or not supported.
0 ptsUnacceptableIdea presence is limited and not supported.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent (20%)
5 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented; ideas are detailed and well-developed.
4 ptsGoodWell-presented; ideas are detailed and mostly well-developed.
3 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported.
2 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable.
0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.
5 pts
Total Points: 25
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.