Instructions
- Review the Advanced Search Strategies Using Boolean Operators handout Download Advanced Search Strategies Using Boolean Operators handout.
- Complete the Boolean Worksheet for PICO ResearchDownload Boolean Worksheet for PICO Research
- Use the LIRN library resources to help you complete the worksheet:
Due
- Date: See due date listed at the top of the assignment page.
- Time: By 11:59 p.m. of the assignment due date.
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
- Submit your Boolean Worksheet for PICO Research document.
- Each response should be clear, concise, and use correct grammar. All sections of the worksheet MUST be completed.
- Review the Group Activity Rubric for grading criteria.
- This activity is worth 100 points.
Rubric
NUR 337 – Group Activity Rubric
NUR 337 – Group Activity Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Key Concepts
20 ptsExemplaryAccurately identifies all key concepts for PICO components.
18 ptsProficientIdentifies most key concepts accurately. (1-2 errors)
16 ptsCompetentIdentifies some key concepts, but with notable gaps. (3-4 errors)
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementSignificant gaps in identification of key concepts. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Fails to identify key concepts accurately. (more than 6 errors)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop Boolean Search Terms
20 ptsExemplaryDevelops precise and effective Boolean search terms.
18 ptsProficientDevelops mostly effective Boolean search terms with minor errors. (1-2 errors)
16 ptsCompetentDevelops basic Boolean search terms with several errors. (3-4 errors)
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementDevelops Boolean search terms with significant errors. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Fails to develop effective Boolean search terms. (more than 6 errors)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRefine Search
15 ptsExemplaryEffectively refines search strategy using Boolean operators.
14 ptsProficientRefines search strategy with minor issues. (1-2 errors)
13 ptsProficientBasic refinement of search strategy with several issues.
12 ptsNeeds ImprovementRefines search strategy with significant issues. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(11 points or below) Fails to refine search strategy effectively.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Search Strategy
15 ptsExemplaryThoroughly documents search strategy with clear rationale.
14 ptsProficientDocuments search strategy with 1-2 errors. Rationale is pertinent to the strategy.
13 ptsProficientBasic documentation with 3-4 errors. Rationale is present but is underdeveloped.
12 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocuments search strategy with 5-6 errors. Rationale is missing or not applicable to search strategy.
0 ptsNot Evident(11 points or below) Fails to document search strategy clearly. Rationale is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate Sources
20 ptsExemplarySources are highly relevant and credible. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are clear.
18 ptsProficientSources are mostly relevant and credible, with 1-2 errors present. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are pertinent.
16 ptsCompetentSources are somewhat relevant and credible, with 3-4 errors. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are present, but underdeveloped.
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementSources are minimally relevant and credible, with 5-6 errors. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are not related to the search.
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Sources are not relevant or credible. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are missing in detail.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
10 ptsExemplaryProvides a clear and insightful reflection on the group discussion. Reflection is more than 5 sentences with error-free writing.
8 ptsProficientProvides a good reflection with minor gaps in insight. Reflection is 5 or more sentences or may have 1-2 errors in writing.
6 ptsCompetentProvides a basic reflection with several gaps in insight. Reflection is 5 sentences or may have 3-4 errors in writing.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides a reflection with significant gaps in insight. Reflection is less than 5 sentences or may have 5-6 errors in writing
0 ptsNot Evident(3 points or below) Fails to provide a clear or insightful reflection. Reflection is less than 5 sentences or may have more than 6 errors in writing.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Module 2 | Complete: Search for Evidence (Research Topic: FALL PREVENTION)
/in /byTable of Contents
Instructions
Due
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
Rubric
NUR 337 – Group Activity Rubric
NUR 337 – Group Activity Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Key Concepts
20 ptsExemplaryAccurately identifies all key concepts for PICO components.
18 ptsProficientIdentifies most key concepts accurately. (1-2 errors)
16 ptsCompetentIdentifies some key concepts, but with notable gaps. (3-4 errors)
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementSignificant gaps in identification of key concepts. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Fails to identify key concepts accurately. (more than 6 errors)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop Boolean Search Terms
20 ptsExemplaryDevelops precise and effective Boolean search terms.
18 ptsProficientDevelops mostly effective Boolean search terms with minor errors. (1-2 errors)
16 ptsCompetentDevelops basic Boolean search terms with several errors. (3-4 errors)
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementDevelops Boolean search terms with significant errors. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Fails to develop effective Boolean search terms. (more than 6 errors)
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRefine Search
15 ptsExemplaryEffectively refines search strategy using Boolean operators.
14 ptsProficientRefines search strategy with minor issues. (1-2 errors)
13 ptsProficientBasic refinement of search strategy with several issues.
12 ptsNeeds ImprovementRefines search strategy with significant issues. (5-6 errors)
0 ptsNot Evident(11 points or below) Fails to refine search strategy effectively.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Search Strategy
15 ptsExemplaryThoroughly documents search strategy with clear rationale.
14 ptsProficientDocuments search strategy with 1-2 errors. Rationale is pertinent to the strategy.
13 ptsProficientBasic documentation with 3-4 errors. Rationale is present but is underdeveloped.
12 ptsNeeds ImprovementDocuments search strategy with 5-6 errors. Rationale is missing or not applicable to search strategy.
0 ptsNot Evident(11 points or below) Fails to document search strategy clearly. Rationale is missing.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate Sources
20 ptsExemplarySources are highly relevant and credible. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are clear.
18 ptsProficientSources are mostly relevant and credible, with 1-2 errors present. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are pertinent.
16 ptsCompetentSources are somewhat relevant and credible, with 3-4 errors. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are present, but underdeveloped.
14 ptsNeeds ImprovementSources are minimally relevant and credible, with 5-6 errors. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are not related to the search.
0 ptsNot Evident(12 points or below) Sources are not relevant or credible. Explanation of relevance to PICO Question and Quality of Evidence are missing in detail.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
10 ptsExemplaryProvides a clear and insightful reflection on the group discussion. Reflection is more than 5 sentences with error-free writing.
8 ptsProficientProvides a good reflection with minor gaps in insight. Reflection is 5 or more sentences or may have 1-2 errors in writing.
6 ptsCompetentProvides a basic reflection with several gaps in insight. Reflection is 5 sentences or may have 3-4 errors in writing.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementProvides a reflection with significant gaps in insight. Reflection is less than 5 sentences or may have 5-6 errors in writing
0 ptsNot Evident(3 points or below) Fails to provide a clear or insightful reflection. Reflection is less than 5 sentences or may have more than 6 errors in writing.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.