Week 4: Assignment – TA

/in /by

Stakeholder Analysis Part I

Stakeholder Analysis is a process used to identify, assess, and prioritize the interests, influence, and importance of key individuals, groups, or organizations that have a stake in a project, policy, or business decision. This analysis helps organizations understand the expectations of stakeholders, how they might be affected by the initiative, and the best strategies for managing their involvement and communication.

  • Key Components of Stakeholder Analysis:
    • Identification: Identifying all potential stakeholders, including internal and external parties, who are affected by or can affect the project or decision.
    • Assessment: Evaluating the stakeholders’ interests, power, influence, and the potential impact they might have on the project.
    • Prioritization: Ranking stakeholders based on their level of influence and interest to determine how much effort should be invested in managing each stakeholder.
    • Engagement Strategies: Developing strategies to effectively engage with stakeholders, addressing their concerns, and leveraging their support to achieve project success.
  • Stakeholder analysis is crucial for:
    • Project Success: It ensures that stakeholder needs and expectations are addressed, reducing resistance and increasing the likelihood of project acceptance.
    • Risk Management: By understanding stakeholders’ potential to influence outcomes, organizations can anticipate challenges and mitigate risks.
    • Resource Allocation: It helps prioritize stakeholders, allowing for efficient allocation of resources to engage those with the most influence effectively.

Stakeholder analysis is important in any type of program, but it is especially important in programs addressing social issues where the impacts of decisions will directly affect many people’s lives. Stakeholder analyses are usually done using a specific model; you are supplied a template for your analysis in this week’s Learning Resources.

For this Assignment, you will build on the principles of sustainability you studied last week, applying them to a social issue within the Harbor City community by completing a stakeholder analysis to determine environmental support for social-entrepreneurial efforts to address that social issue. Please note that you will post and share your stakeholder analysis in this week’s Discussion, so you may want to look at the Discussion now to better prepare.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Examine the data on the two most prevalent social issues impacting Harbor City, using the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center media in the Learning Resources. Select one issue to discuss for this Assignment.
  • Review the descriptions of individuals in the Harbor City community or region who may be potential stakeholders for programs to address your selected social issue.

The Assignment:

  • Complete a stakeholder analysis using the template in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Provide a rationale for why you chose your selected stakeholders.

By Day 4

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

PBHL_8200_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

PBHL_8200_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >35.0 ptsEXCELLENT – above expectationsPaper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.

35 to >31.0 ptsGOOD – met expectationsPaper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.

31 to >30.0 ptsFAIR – below expectationsPaper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

30 to >0 ptsPOOR – Significantly below expectations or missingPaper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

20 to >17.0 ptsEXCELLENT – above expectationsPaper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the Assignment.

17 to >15.0 ptsGOOD – met expectationsPaper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or it may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat fewer than the expected number or type of sources.

15 to >14.0 ptsFAIR – below expectationsPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or it may contain many writing and/or spelling errors or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

14 to >0 ptsPOOR – Significantly below expectations or missingPaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or it relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

20 pts

Total Points: 60

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Week 4 Assignment – TA

/in /by

Organizational Assessment for the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center

For this week’s Assignment, you will apply what you have learned this week about organizational assessment to the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center (HCBHC) case study.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center media found in this week’s learning resources. Specifically review the following:
    • HCBHC Brochure with mission statement, goals, and services.
    • Organizational Chart with major departments: HR, Operations (including IT), Comptroller, Legal (including Regulatory), and Clinics, as well as department overviews covering functions and roles.
    • HCBHC Corporate Policy Document with mission statement and organizational vision in context.
    • HCBHC Annual Report with findings/recommendations and associated assessment data.
    • Corporate Memo on the community need for additional services to support the aging population and the alarming increase in adolescent substance abuse.
  • Pay particular attention to the HCBHC’s mission, vision, and services, as well as their assessment data and goals.
  • Consider what areas might need to be targeted for improvement and what trends might impact strategic plans.
  • Carefully consider this Week’s learning resources and apply your learning to HCBHC’s mission, vision, services, and strategic plans.
  • Specifically consider readings from the current and preceding weeks:
    • Review Chapters 3 and 9 from the textbook, Burns, L. R., Bradley, E. H., & Weiner, B. J. (2020). Shortell and Kaluzny’s health care management: Organization design and behavior (7th ed.). Cengage.
    • Review the following found on the CDC site: Healthy aging.Links to an external site.

The Assignment:

Compose a 2- to 4-page Organizational Assessment on the following:

  • Provided the media on HCBHC, especially the Annual Report with findings/recommendations, explain what areas you determined to target for improvement and provide support for their selection. Also include, what area(s) in the summary report you would like to have more information on and why?
  • Given the HCBHC Corporate Memo concerning additional community needs for services, assess how these trends may have bearing on the organization’s future.
  • In your Organizational Assessment, also touch on any one assessment issue tied to meeting regulatory requirements.

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PBHL_8012_Week4_AssignmentRubric

PBHL_8012_Week4_AssignmentRubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

35 to >31.4 ptsEXCELLENTPaper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.

31.4 to >27.9 ptsGOODPaper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.

27.9 to >24.4 ptsFAIRPaper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

24.4 to >0 ptsPOORPaper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

15 to >13.4 ptsEXCELLENTPaper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

13.4 to >11.9 ptsGOODPaper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

11.9 to >10.4 ptsFAIRPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

10.4 to >0 ptsPOORPaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

15 pts

Total Points: 50

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers