Week 8: Assignment – TA

/in /by

Creating a Business Plan

This week, you explored why you need a business plan and considered the questions you need to answer in order to develop one. In this Assignment, you will get into the actual writing of a business plan. You will use the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center (HCBHC) new program initiative to complete the Assignment, so make sure to carefully review all the materials related to the program you have selected (opioid abuse/recovery or elder care), including your communications plan and marketing brochure from last week. This will help you identify the information you will need to write your business plan, consider possible roadblocks, and formulate how you will address any challenges or obstacles.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

The Assignment:

Use the Business Plan Template in this week’s Learning Resources to create a business plan for HCBHC’s new program (either opioid abuse/recovery or elder care).

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

PBHL_8200_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

PBHL_8200_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

40 to >35.0 ptsEXCELLENT – above expectationsPaper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.

35 to >31.0 ptsGOOD – met expectationsPaper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.

31 to >30.0 ptsFAIR – below expectationsPaper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

30 to >0 ptsPOOR – Significantly below expectations or missingPaper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text(s) and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

20 to >17.0 ptsEXCELLENT – above expectationsPaper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the Assignment.

17 to >15.0 ptsGOOD – met expectationsPaper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or it may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat fewer than the expected number or type of sources.

15 to >14.0 ptsFAIR – below expectationsPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or it may contain many writing and/or spelling errors or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

14 to >0 ptsPOOR – Significantly below expectations or missingPaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or it relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

20 pts

Total Points: 60

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Week 8 Assignment – TA

/in /by

This is the feedback for the quantitative that you did

 

This is a very good submission. You went beyond summarizing by discussing strengths (multicenter design, standardized measures) and limitations (dropouts, institutional differences, need for long-term follow-up). Greay Critical Thinking.

Avoid unsupported statements.For example:

“The article advances nursing education literature by the emergence of a new trend…”

This is a broad claim. It would be stronger if connected directly to the article’s findings or cited with evidence.

Be more specific in the analysis.Instead of saying:

“Standardized competency measures…”

You could identify the actual assessment instruments or explain how competency was measured. 

 

 

Annotation of a Qualitative Research Article

Submit: Annotation of a Qualitative Research Article

This week, you will submit the annotation of a qualitative research article on a topic of your interest. Narrative, ethnographic, grounded theory, case study, and phenomenology are examples of types of research designs or approaches used in qualitative research.

An annotation consists of three separate paragraphs that cover three respective components: summary, analysis, and application. These three components convey the relevance and value of the source. As such, an annotation demonstrates your critical thinking about, and authority on, the source topic. This week’s annotation is a precursor to the annotated bibliography assignment due in Week 10.

An annotated bibliography is a document containing selected sources accompanied by a respective annotation of each source. In preparation for your own future research, an annotated bibliography provides a background for understanding a portion of the existing literature on a particular topic. It is also a useful first step in gathering sources in preparation for writing a subsequent literature review as part of a dissertation.

Please review the assignment instructions below and click on the underlined words for information about how to craft each component of an annotation.

Please use the document “Annotated Bibliography Template with Example” for additional guidance.

It is recommended that you use the grading rubric as a self-evaluation tool before submitting your assignment. 

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES  

By Day 7

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

RSCH_8110_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

RSCH_8110_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary

26 to >23.3 ptsEXCELLENTPaper provides an excellent overview of all important information from the source, including the topic of the source, the methods they employed, the theoretical or conceptual basis of the study, and the conclusions.

23.3 to >20.7 ptsGOODPaper provides an overview of the important information from the source, although some aspects of the summary (e.g., descriptions of the methods, the theoretical or conceptual framework, the conclusions) are less detailed than others.

20.7 to >18.1 ptsFAIRPaper provides only a cursory review of the source. Several important domains are either missing altogether or are insufficiently explained.

18.1 to >0 ptsPOORPaper provides little to no information about what the source was about. The source’s topic, methods, framework, and/or conclusions are either absent or very unclear.

26 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique

26 to >23.3 ptsEXCELLENTPaper provides a thorough and dispassionate critique or analysis of the source, addressing both its good and bad qualities. The critique addresses how aligned the research question is to the existing body of knowledge, the appropriateness of the theoretical or conceptual framework to the study, the sufficiency of the methods and design, and the generalizability/transferability of the results in other contexts. The paper also provides a critical analysis of the social change implications of the study’s findings.

23.3 to >20.7 ptsGOODPaper provides a critique of the source, addressing both its good and bad qualities, but does not cover all important aspects of the source (e.g., might be missing a critique of the methods, designs, framework, or conclusions).

20.7 to >18.1 ptsFAIRPaper provides a critique of the source but is missing several important domains or some of the critiques are emotionally laden, not dispassionate.

18.1 to >0 ptsPOORPaper’s critique is inappropriate. It is either based on a weak understanding of the source’s methods, or it is not based on empirical evidence (e.g., it is based on an emotional reaction to the source’s content).

26 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication

26 to >23.3 ptsEXCELLENTPaper provides a clear justification for how the source is applicable to one’s research question/research interests. The paper addresses the extent to which the source’s topic is similar to one’s research interests, how the source’s method is applicable to one’s research, and how the source helps to guide one’s own research. Overall, the application of this source to one’s research is very clear.

23.3 to >20.7 ptsGOODPaper provides a justification for how the source is applicable to one’s research, but there is some uncertainty about how the source provides a framework for one’s research (e.g., the connection between the source’s method, framework, or conclusions to one’s research is not clear).

20.7 to >18.1 ptsFAIRPaper provides some justification for how the source is similar to one’s research, but its application is unclear.

18.1 to >0 ptsPOORThere is very little connection between the source and one’s research interests. There is little to no explanation about why the source was chosen or how it will inform one’s research plan.

26 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

22 to >19.7 ptsEXCELLENTPaper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA Style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

19.7 to >17.5 ptsGOODPaper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA Style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

17.5 to >15.3 ptsFAIRPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

15.3 to >0 ptsPOORPaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA Style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

22 pts

Total Points: 100

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Week 8 Assignment – TA

/in /by

Training and development for the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center

Behavioral health care organizations rely on human resource professionals to provide them with quality individuals that produce results within the organization and in alignment with organizational goals. Developing an organization’s staff involves much more than a subject matter expert putting together a training course. There are several crucial steps involved in creating a training and development strategy. The first among those is conducting a needs assessment of the organization that can guide training and development efforts. For this week’s Assignment, you will take a closer look at Harbor City Behavioral Health Center’s human resources, training, and development needs.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare for this assignment:

  • Review the Harbor City Behavioral Health Center media, paying particular attention to the human resources information provided in the media. Specifically review the following:
  • Consider the center’s human resources needs, and ways to approach needs assessment, training design and development, implementation, and evaluation of training effectiveness.
  • Review this week’s learning resources related to human resources and workforce development. In particular consider the following readings from the current week :
  • Chapters 3 and 8 of your course text, Shortell and Kaluzny’s health care management: Organization design and behavior
  • The article, “Research summary: The effect of whole team training in evidence-based interventions on the knowledge, well-being and morale of inpatient mental health workers”

The Assignment

Compose a 2-4 page paper that addresses the following:

  • Based on the provided HR Information on the center and your review of this week’s learning resources, what steps would you take to conduct a needs analysis for designing and executing a training program to address the center’s identified issues?
  • How would you evaluate the effectiveness of the training program once it is implemented?
  • Also include a one paragraph job description for the Training & Development Coordinator position that is currently open.

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

PBHL_8012_Week8_AssignmentRubric

PBHL_8012_Week8_AssignmentRubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting

35 to >31.4 ptsEXCELLENTPaper demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper provides significant detail, including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.

31.4 to >27.9 ptsGOODPaper demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.

27.9 to >24.4 ptsFAIRPaper demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

24.4 to >0 ptsPOORPaper demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Paper is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

15 to >13.4 ptsEXCELLENTPaper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper contains multiple, appropriate, and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

13.4 to >11.9 ptsGOODPaper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

11.9 to >10.4 ptsFAIRPaper is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

10.4 to >0 ptsPOORPaper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

15 pts

Total Points: 50

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers