Module 4 | Discuss
Discussion Board: ATI Video Case Study 3.0: Health Care Law: Client Rights & Informed Consent
Overview
This discussion requires you to access the ATI Testing website. To access ATI, use the ATI Testing link in the Canvas navigation menu or select this ATI Testing linkLinks to an external site. to navigate to your login page.
Instructions
Once logged in, go to My ATI, select the “Learn†tab, and then choose “ATI Video Case Studies RN 3.0.†Watch the video case study Health Care Law: Clients Rights & Informed Consent (1:27).
As you watch the video, consider how you would respond if this were your daughter.
DO NOT respond to the questions following the video case study. Instead, write 200–250 words responding to the discussion prompts provided. Then, respond to at least two of your peers’ posts.
Discussion Prompts
- Provide an example of a different approach the nurse might take to resolve the conflict between Mrs. Lieberman and her daughter.
- Identify two strategies the nurse should use to help ensure that clients participate in the decision-making process regarding their care.
- What types of patient and family teaching must be provided to understand the principles associated with informed consent, refusal of treatment, and advance directives?
- How would your interactions make the patient and their family members feel?
- How would therapeutic communication play a role in this interaction?
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstration of Knowledge and Understanding of Content in Initial Post
25 ptsOutstandingAnswers all discussion questions and prompts with pertinent information demonstrating critical thinking and thorough understanding of course content. Post exceeds 200 words in length.
20 ptsGoodAnswers all discussion questions. Missing detailed information on 1 prompt or required elements. Post exceeds 200 words in length.
15 ptsProficientAnswers all discussion questions. Some answers are superficial without clear evidence of critical thinking and understanding of content. Lacks detailed information and missing 2 prompts or required elements. Initial post below 200 words but exceeds 150 words.
10 ptsNeeds ImprovementBriefly answers all questions but some responses are not correct and/or do not demonstrate understanding of course content. Missing 3+ prompts or majority of required elements. Post does not exceed 150 words.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo discussion board post/no submission.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Substance of Peer Responses
15 ptsOutstandingProvides 2 response posts to peers that demonstrate critical thinking and directly address the original post. The post demonstrates extension of the original post, an alternative point of view to foster further discussion or reference/resources to support their response.
12 ptsGoodProvides 2 response posts to peers that directly address the original post. One post is not substantive (not extending knowledge of the original post, an alternative point of view or resources to support response)
9 ptsProficient1 or 2 response posts are submitted but they could be more substantive or offer little insight to further discussion or a repeat of information already posted without adding further information showing critical thinking. May include responses like “I agree†or “good point†with some supporting evidence but not thoroughly written.
6 ptsNeeds ImprovementResponse posts “I agree†or “good point,†or a repeat of information already posted without adding further information showing critical thinking. Student responds to a maximum of 1 peer.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo response posts. Student does not respond to any peers.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAcademic Language/Grammar/Composition
10 ptsOutstandingExcellent use and control of language. Posts and Responses are clearly written and understandable. No misspelled words or typographical errors Citation provided if reference/author cited in posts. APA formatting of reference is used expertly with no errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) minimum of 1 peer-reviewed reference and minimum of 1 reference published within the last 5 years.
8 ptsGoodGood use and control of language. Minor errors (< 2) such as misspelled words, typographical errors or sentence structure issues. APA formatting of references is used with 1-2 errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) maximum of 1 peer-reviewed reference and maximum of 1 reference published within the last 5 years.
6 ptsProficientAverage use and control of language. Some (3-5) errors in post. APA formatting of references is used with 3-4 errors. Includes (as required for specific courses) maximum of 1 peer-reviewed reference. References are published >5 years ago.
4 ptsNeeds ImprovementNeeds improvement. Below average use and control of language. Significant errors (>5) such as misspelled words, typographical errors or sentence structure issues. APA formatting of references is used with 5+ errors. Does not include (as required for specific courses) 1 peer-reviewed reference. References are published >5 years ago.
0 ptsUnacceptableSentences are incoherent and/or improperly structured. Post has multiple typographical errors, misspelled words, which do not reflect appropriate level of writing. APA formatting of references are not used and/or references not included.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
