Watch a video of two providers interviewing a patient.
Video demonstrates example of standard interviewing techniques versus example of motivational interviewing (MI) using The Process of MI framework:
Engage – Build rapport, use open-ended questions, uncover values/hopes, and offer compassionate reflections.
Focus – Bring the discussion to the health concern at hand, eliciting symptoms, concerns, and wellness indicators.
Evoke – Explore reasons for and against change; use readiness rulers, double-sided reflections, and pros/cons.
Plan – Collaboratively set attainable goals and elicit patient commitment to specific next steps.
Assignment (1–2 pages)
Compare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing in regard to effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
Explain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
Reflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
Consider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
Use at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old. Cite all sources in APA format.
By Sunday of Week 1
Submit the Assignment.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD1Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Thoroughly explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Adequately explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Minimal or undeveloped explanation of which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding effect on patient behavior; comparison is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed explanation of how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide an analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices; analysis is vague, unclear, or inadequate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
10to >8.94 ptsExcellentUses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
8.94to >7.94 ptsGoodUses 2 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
7.94to >6.94 ptsFairUses 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source published within the last 5 years.
6.94to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources or sources used are older than 5 years.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting
5to >4.46 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors.
4.46to >3.96 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors.
3.96to >3.46 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
5to >4.46 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4.46to >3.96 ptsGoodUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
3.96to >3.46 ptsFairUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
3.46to >0 ptsPoorPost contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Motivational Interviewing
/in /byTable of Contents
Motivational Interviewing
A provider’s interviewing techniques and communication style can have a significant impact on patient motivation and behavior.
Level 1: No AI Permitted
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
Watch a video of two providers interviewing a patient.
Assignment (1–2 pages)
Compare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing in regard to effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
Use at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old. Cite all sources in APA format.
By Sunday of Week 1
Submit the Assignment.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Thoroughly explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Adequately explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Minimal or undeveloped explanation of which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding effect on patient behavior; comparison is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed explanation of how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
20to >17.88 ptsExcellentProvides a fully developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
17.88to >15.88 ptsGoodProvides an adequately developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
15.88to >13.88 ptsFairProvides a minimally developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
13.88to >0 ptsPoorDoes not provide an analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices; analysis is vague, unclear, or inadequate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
10to >8.94 ptsExcellentUses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
8.94to >7.94 ptsGoodUses 2 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
7.94to >6.94 ptsFairUses 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source published within the last 5 years.
6.94to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources or sources used are older than 5 years.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting
5to >4.46 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors.
4.46to >3.96 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors.
3.96to >3.46 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
5to >4.46 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4.46to >3.96 ptsGoodUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
3.96to >3.46 ptsFairUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
3.46to >0 ptsPoorPost contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.