Instructions
Reflect on a past workplace conversation you have either witnessed or experienced in a professional setting. Write a 1- to 2-page paper analyzing this conversation using the following questions.
- Describe the setting where the interaction took place? Who were the parties, and what were their titles? Give a brief summary of the interaction.
- How did the individuals’ demonstrate professionalism? Was there something in their tone, demeanor, or dress that indicated professionalism appropriate to the setting?
- How did the parties demonstrate accountability within the conversation? Was this conversation respectful?
- Were the individuals effective in their communication with one another? Explain.
- How can this experience be used to help you in nursing practice? Locate at least one resource to support your answer.
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
- The activity should follow APA (7th ed.) format and be no more than 1–2 double-spaced pages in length. This does not include the title or reference pages.
- It is expected that your answers are free of grammatical errors and in complete sentences, where appropriate.
- Be sure to cite your sources.
- Review the Writing Assignment Rubric for grading criteria.
- This activity is worth 100 points.
Rubric
NUR 218 – Writing Assignment Rubric
NUR 218 – Writing Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
30 ptsOutstandingPurpose is clear.
20 ptsGoodShows awareness of purpose.
10 ptsProficientShows some awareness of purpose.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementShows limited awareness of purpose.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo awareness.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.
20 ptsGoodWell-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed, and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.
10 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable. Idea presence is limited and/or not supported.
0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
30 ptsOutstandingWell-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions, and conclusion. All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples, and have smooth transitions.
20 ptsGoodGood overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples, and have transitions.
10 ptsProficientThere is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools used are weak. Some paragraphs have clear ideas. Support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementOrganizational tools appear to be missing, or are very weak. Paragraphs have clear ideas but no supporting content or examples.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo sense of organization and lacks clear ideas.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
10 ptsOutstandingSentence structure and grammar are excellent. Punctuation and spelling are correct. No mistakes in citation style. Conforms in every way to format requirements.
8 ptsGoodSentence structure and grammar are strong despite occasional lapses. Punctuation and spelling are mostly correct. Some mistakes in citation style. Generally conforms to format requirements.
5 ptsProficientSignificant problems in sentence structure and grammar. Some errors in punctuation, spelling, and citation style. Conforms to some format requirements.
3 ptsNeeds ImprovementMajor problems in sentence structure and grammar. Frequent errors in punctuation, spelling, and citation style. Lack of citations. Does not conform to format requirements.
0 ptsUnacceptableMajor problems in sentence structure and grammar. Numerous errors in punctuation and spelling. Lack of citations when they should have been included. Appears to have limited formatting.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Module 1 | Workplace Conversation Analysis
/in /byTable of Contents
Instructions
Reflect on a past workplace conversation you have either witnessed or experienced in a professional setting. Write a 1- to 2-page paper analyzing this conversation using the following questions.
Submission and Assessment Guidelines
Rubric
NUR 218 – Writing Assignment Rubric
NUR 218 – Writing Assignment Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose
30 ptsOutstandingPurpose is clear.
20 ptsGoodShows awareness of purpose.
10 ptsProficientShows some awareness of purpose.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementShows limited awareness of purpose.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo awareness.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
30 ptsOutstandingExceptionally well-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, well-developed, supported with specific evidence and facts, as well as examples and specific details.
20 ptsGoodWell-presented and argued; ideas are detailed, developed, and supported with evidence and details, mostly specific.
10 ptsProficientContent is sound and solid; ideas are present but not particularly developed or supported; some evidence, but usually of a generalized nature.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementContent is slightly reasonable. Idea presence is limited and/or not supported.
0 ptsUnacceptableContent is not sound.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
30 ptsOutstandingWell-planned and well-thought out. Includes title, introduction, statement of main idea, transitions, and conclusion. All paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with examples, and have smooth transitions.
20 ptsGoodGood overall organization, includes the main organizational tools. Most paragraphs have clear ideas, are supported with some examples, and have transitions.
10 ptsProficientThere is a sense of organization, although some of the organizational tools used are weak. Some paragraphs have clear ideas. Support from examples may be missing and transitions are weak.
5 ptsNeeds ImprovementOrganizational tools appear to be missing, or are very weak. Paragraphs have clear ideas but no supporting content or examples.
0 ptsUnacceptableNo sense of organization and lacks clear ideas.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
10 ptsOutstandingSentence structure and grammar are excellent. Punctuation and spelling are correct. No mistakes in citation style. Conforms in every way to format requirements.
8 ptsGoodSentence structure and grammar are strong despite occasional lapses. Punctuation and spelling are mostly correct. Some mistakes in citation style. Generally conforms to format requirements.
5 ptsProficientSignificant problems in sentence structure and grammar. Some errors in punctuation, spelling, and citation style. Conforms to some format requirements.
3 ptsNeeds ImprovementMajor problems in sentence structure and grammar. Frequent errors in punctuation, spelling, and citation style. Lack of citations. Does not conform to format requirements.
0 ptsUnacceptableMajor problems in sentence structure and grammar. Numerous errors in punctuation and spelling. Lack of citations when they should have been included. Appears to have limited formatting.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.