Assignment: Cardiovascular System Patient Case, Part 1
This Assessment invites you to apply your pharmacological knowledge to a real-world scenario. You will be tasked with developing a personalized medication plan, considering factors such as genetics, age, ethnicity, and pathophysiological changes. This assignment emphasizes the importance of ethical and legal considerations in advanced practice, requiring you to justify your clinical decisions and write complete medication orders. The study questions and required readings will serve as essential tools to guide your analysis and support your evidence-based approach.
Level 1: No AI Permitted
- AI tools may not be used at any stage
- Common for clinical documentation or performance‑based work
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
To prepare:
- Complete the Cardiovascular System Patient Case scenario.
- Utilize course resources, clinical practice guidelines, and scholarly sources published within the past 5 years to assist you in completing the cardiovascular system patient case.
- Download the Patient Case Study Template.
By Sunday of Week 1
Complete the Patient Case Study Template. The template will include the following:
- Describe and outline the specific medications you would prescribe for the provided patient. In your description, be sure to consider factors such as genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease (e.g., renal failure, heart failure, liver failure).
- Discuss the ethical and legal considerations of the personalized plan.
- Write a complete medication order for all medications prescribed.
- Use and cite at least three scholarly sources published within the past 5 years, and follow the APA format for in-text citations and reference list.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD1Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
NURS_6521_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6521_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Selection and Personalization
15to >13.5 ptsExcellentMedication choices are thoroughly justified with clear, evidence‑based rationale. Demonstrates strong integration of genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and pathophysiological factors (e.g., renal/hepatic/cardiac impairment). Personalization is comprehensive and clinically sound.
13.5to >11.9 ptsGoodMedication choices are appropriate and supported with rationale. Most personalized patient factors are considered, though depth may be limited.
11.9to >10.4 ptsFairMedication choices are partially justified; rationale may be vague or incomplete. Limited personalization or missing key factors.
10.4to >0 ptsPoorMedication choices are unclear, inappropriate, or unsupported. No meaningful personalization present.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical and Legal Considerations
12.5to >11.1 ptsExcellentDemonstrates sophisticated insight into ethical and legal implications (e.g., prescriptive authority, informed consent, cultural humility, scope of practice). Connections to the case are strong and well‑supported.
11.1to >9.9 ptsGoodAddresses relevant ethical and legal issues with appropriate detail; some application to the case is evident.
9.9to >8.6 ptsFairMentions ethical and legal considerations, but discussion lacks depth or clear application to the case.
8.6to >0 ptsPoorEthical and legal considerations are inaccurate, missing, or irrelevant.
12.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Orders (Accuracy and Completeness)
12.5to >11.1 ptsExcellentAll medication orders are complete, accurate, and written in correct clinical format (drug, dose, route, frequency, duration, special instructions). Orders reflect safe, evidence‑based prescribing.
11.1to >9.9 ptsGoodOrders are mostly correct with minor errors in formatting or specificity. Safe and generally appropriate.
9.9to >8.6 ptsFairOrders include several formatting, dosing, or instruction errors. Some concerns about safety or completeness.
8.6to >0 ptsPoorOrders are incomplete, incorrect, unsafe, or not in clinical format.
12.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis and Source Integration
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentDemonstrates strong critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodDemonstrates sufficient critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairDemonstrates minimal critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorLacks critical analysis and/or synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNumber and Quality of Sources
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentUses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodUses 2 number of peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairUses 1-2 number of peer-reviewed scholarly sources; 1-2 number of sources are not scholarly.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules. Student work is not original– AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorPost contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
2.5 pts
Total Points: 50
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Assgn 1 pharm
/in /byTable of Contents
Assignment: Cardiovascular System Patient Case, Part 1
This Assessment invites you to apply your pharmacological knowledge to a real-world scenario. You will be tasked with developing a personalized medication plan, considering factors such as genetics, age, ethnicity, and pathophysiological changes. This assignment emphasizes the importance of ethical and legal considerations in advanced practice, requiring you to justify your clinical decisions and write complete medication orders. The study questions and required readings will serve as essential tools to guide your analysis and support your evidence-based approach.
Level 1: No AI Permitted
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
By Sunday of Week 1
Complete the Patient Case Study Template. The template will include the following:
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
NURS_6521_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6521_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Selection and Personalization
15to >13.5 ptsExcellentMedication choices are thoroughly justified with clear, evidence‑based rationale. Demonstrates strong integration of genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and pathophysiological factors (e.g., renal/hepatic/cardiac impairment). Personalization is comprehensive and clinically sound.
13.5to >11.9 ptsGoodMedication choices are appropriate and supported with rationale. Most personalized patient factors are considered, though depth may be limited.
11.9to >10.4 ptsFairMedication choices are partially justified; rationale may be vague or incomplete. Limited personalization or missing key factors.
10.4to >0 ptsPoorMedication choices are unclear, inappropriate, or unsupported. No meaningful personalization present.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthical and Legal Considerations
12.5to >11.1 ptsExcellentDemonstrates sophisticated insight into ethical and legal implications (e.g., prescriptive authority, informed consent, cultural humility, scope of practice). Connections to the case are strong and well‑supported.
11.1to >9.9 ptsGoodAddresses relevant ethical and legal issues with appropriate detail; some application to the case is evident.
9.9to >8.6 ptsFairMentions ethical and legal considerations, but discussion lacks depth or clear application to the case.
8.6to >0 ptsPoorEthical and legal considerations are inaccurate, missing, or irrelevant.
12.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication Orders (Accuracy and Completeness)
12.5to >11.1 ptsExcellentAll medication orders are complete, accurate, and written in correct clinical format (drug, dose, route, frequency, duration, special instructions). Orders reflect safe, evidence‑based prescribing.
11.1to >9.9 ptsGoodOrders are mostly correct with minor errors in formatting or specificity. Safe and generally appropriate.
9.9to >8.6 ptsFairOrders include several formatting, dosing, or instruction errors. Some concerns about safety or completeness.
8.6to >0 ptsPoorOrders are incomplete, incorrect, unsafe, or not in clinical format.
12.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis and Source Integration
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentDemonstrates strong critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodDemonstrates sufficient critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairDemonstrates minimal critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorLacks critical analysis and/or synthesis of course concepts and module readings.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNumber and Quality of Sources
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentUses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodUses 2 number of peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairUses 1-2 number of peer-reviewed scholarly sources; 1-2 number of sources are not scholarly.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodAll sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairAll sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors. Student work is original– no AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorMissing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules. Student work is not original– AI-generated text is presented as student’s own, independent work.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
2.5to >2.2 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
2.2to >1.9 ptsGoodUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
1.9to >1.7 ptsFairUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
1.7to >0 ptsPoorPost contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
2.5 pts
Total Points: 50
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.